peitron
40
I chose this one...
The 38 case proportions were really nice when I tried it on, but the numerals on the dial didn't sing to me, probably because I have another dress watch with numerals.
The MUT Grande was too "grande" for my wrist, and the small arrows on 3 and 9 made the dial look somewhat empty at first.
Now I'm looking for a black face dial on a silver case of similar proportions.
This message has been edited by peitron on 2016-05-06 08:11:42
Jaeger Lecoultre Master Ultra Thin 38,5, 40 and 38 mm.
When I was reviewing the new Master Ultra Thin case sizes for the SIHH 2014, I asked the Manufacture to find me the MUT 38, 38, 5 and 40 mm versions, to take a side by side picture. From left to right: 38, 5, 40 and 38 mm. Here we are discussing MUT " Tim...
Nicolas, after looking at these watches ...............
my ranking is: 1. 38 2. 38,5 3. 40 But the one I miss the most, is still the minimalist 34 (as you do). Cheers, hope to see in in Hong Kong again soon. Henry
The 34 was really something. Like a good artist...
It is better aporeciates. Once discontinued. Hope to see you in your place soon, my dear friend. All the best. Nicolas
And the 1907 and Jubilée are top offerings. I was surprised by the turn they took with the 38.5 and the 40, the seconds
As they are present difficulties for me. All others if seen with no second had were mesmerizing. Possibly a central second would be different or a pronounced recess on the sundial. And as others said, looking back at the 34, there we have another top piec...
That made me think a lot when I took this picture, Robert.
34, 38 and 39 mm are by far my favs. I would say 34 and 39, then 38. No seconds, no date, nothing else than the essence of Beauty and Purity. Best, Nicolas
I chose this one...
The 38 case proportions were really nice when I tried it on, but the numerals on the dial didn't sing to me, probably because I have another dress watch with numerals. The MUT Grande was too "grande" for my wrist, and the small arrows on 3 and 9 made the ...
