marcello pisani
513
however ...
Oct 07, 2014,10:52 AM
low 24 mill. movements can well be from 1966 .
Comments:
view entire thread
Omega Speedmaster Series 1/12
By: nilomis : October 7th, 2014-04:43
Team, Allow me to start detailing my previous post ("A nice surprise ...") by starting with a mysterious one. Vintage watches, in special Omega, always brings to us surprises and debate. The one that I present today follows this rule by having a strange d...
these dials were ..
By: marcello pisani : October 7th, 2014-10:35
made for the Japanese market .. also with " banana " lugs some years after ( early 70s ) . this older version is much rarer than the other one .
Now we are talking ...
By: nilomis : October 7th, 2014-10:38
Marcelo, Any idea about why they wrote "Mark II"? I have the (unproven, of course) theory that the name "Mark II" was used later without any relation to this one. Ciao, Nilo
about movement numbers ...
By: marcello pisani : October 7th, 2014-10:43
also many SM 300 with mov. number in the same range have been produced in 1967 according to Omega certificates.
Vintage Omegas are fun ...
By: nilomis : October 7th, 2014-10:47
Because of those small details. For the record, I believe that Omega, among all manufacturers, is the one that has better documentation, by far. Cheers, Nilo
however ...
By: marcello pisani : October 7th, 2014-10:52
low 24 mill. movements can well be from 1966 .
Same here ...
By: nilomis : October 8th, 2014-03:53
If this watch was presented to me, without any info, I never considered it because: a) The chronograph seconds, by my book, don't match the hour/min hands (it's a 321, this chrono hand looks the one used by 861 ones). b) Mark II in 1965!!! Let's wait and ...
Fantastic
By: nacho217 : October 9th, 2014-11:11
Great collection , this is a really exclusive (and nice) piece
nice and rare, but
By: ztirual : October 9th, 2014-12:28
isn't the second's chrono hand not supposed to match the orange dial? Z'