My Posts

This is from the seller. I have polished the screws a bit, and replaced the click with Chronometre version. Will post updated pic tomorrow. Other suggestions?

It had some obvious issues: no crystal, dial completely shot, and second hand is wrong; and some not-so-obvious issues: a couple of Chronometre grade parts hard been replaced by Non-Chronometre parts (thanks Erich). But I liked that is was two-tone, and especially that it was rose gold. So I tossed

The dial is (I believe) the original railmaster extra-thick dial and was redone.

Not as good an an original dial, but much better than before:

It is en route to Andy. Will post results!

Will respectfully disagree with the "if lollipop then no broad arrow" comment as there are numerous pictures of these existing together, even in the post which follows mine . But the proportion of the "pop" to the rest of the "lolli" is bothersome. I think though, that Omega did use this type second

At least I found it offensive at first glance. But on further review, I noticed some things I liked: The stretch bracelet is in spectacular condition, and has the # 6 end links: The case still has the original brushed/polished finish, and the edges are still fairly crisp: While the dial looks like i

it looked all original to me, and the price seemed more than reasonable. Opinions from the experts?