Omega Speedmaster Series 1/12

Oct 07, 2014,04:43 AM
 

Team,

Allow me to start detailing my previous post ("A nice surprise ...") by starting with a mysterious one.

Vintage watches, in special Omega, always brings to us surprises and debate.

The one that I present today follows this rule by having a strange dial.

When our good Dr. No pointed this watch on the post, I confess that I didn't paid too much attention on it.

On a call with Mr. G. about the "racing dial" he told me that Mr. Petros, from the Omega Museum somehow validated this watch, that Mr. G. always imagine to be some form of "franken". It seems that this watch is real and also that there is one on the Omega Museum.

Mr. G. is waiting for the "extract of the archives" in order to have it documented.

Enough talk, let's see this baby:

From start, it just look like a 60's Speedmaster Professional, straight lugs, with a "racing dial".




On a coarse macro, we can see the mystery: "Mark II" on the dial!!!

For the ones on a rush, the Omega Speedmaster Mark II dial don't fit a moon watch case!




Beautiful patina and using a 10x magnification I, and many others, could not see any indication of redial.




One more picture, with high contrast to see the details.




For sure, this speedy was used and used and used. It shows.




Case opened and it shows "ST 105.003-65".




The movement serial is 24 million.




Now the "plot thickens". According to multiple Speedmaster Serial numbers, 24 million, put it in 1967 - www.chronomaddox.com l

Other table shows it in between 1966-1969!

Now, what is doing this "Mark II" on the dial?

Let's discuss?

Cheers,

Nilo



More posts: MuseumSpecialitiesSpeedmasterSpeedmaster Mark II

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

these dials were ..

 
 By: marcello pisani : October 7th, 2014-10:35
made for the Japanese market .. also with " banana " lugs some years after ( early 70s ) . this older version is much rarer than the other one .

Now we are talking ...

 
 By: nilomis : October 7th, 2014-10:38
Marcelo, Any idea about why they wrote "Mark II"? I have the (unproven, of course) theory that the name "Mark II" was used later without any relation to this one. Ciao, Nilo

no it's the very first time I see ...

 
 By: marcello pisani : October 7th, 2014-10:44
such a dial signed " mark II " ...

about movement numbers ...

 
 By: marcello pisani : October 7th, 2014-10:43
also many SM 300 with mov. number in the same range have been produced in 1967 according to Omega certificates.

Vintage Omegas are fun ...

 
 By: nilomis : October 7th, 2014-10:47
Because of those small details. For the record, I believe that Omega, among all manufacturers, is the one that has better documentation, by far. Cheers, Nilo

however ...

 
 By: marcello pisani : October 7th, 2014-10:52
low 24 mill. movements can well be from 1966 .

Very nice watch Nilo, congratulations!

 
 By: Sandgroper : October 7th, 2014-22:35
I really love that "racing" dial and the mouvement look pretty neat too. Cheers Francois from Down Under

First time I see such a dial in a 105-003. I would be very curious to see what...

 
 By: amanico : October 7th, 2014-23:29
Omega will say, in the certificate! Best, Nicolas

Same here ...

 
 By: nilomis : October 8th, 2014-03:53
If this watch was presented to me, without any info, I never considered it because: a) The chronograph seconds, by my book, don't match the hour/min hands (it's a 321, this chrono hand looks the one used by 861 ones). b) Mark II in 1965!!! Let's wait and ... 

What is the diameter of this dial ?

 
 By: DrStrong : October 8th, 2014-04:10
I have a "normal" mk2 dial that I can measure, it is 32mm across if I remeber well.

If not mistaken, this could be the rarest . . .

 
 By: Dr No : October 8th, 2014-10:24
. . . of the rare. My recollection is there's only a handful of these in existence. I'm checking with Bill to corroborate . . .

Fantastic

 
 By: nacho217 : October 9th, 2014-11:11
Great collection , this is a really exclusive (and nice) piece

nice and rare, but

 
 By: ztirual : October 9th, 2014-12:28
isn't the second's chrono hand not supposed to match the orange dial? Z'