There's no doubt it's very early, the question is how "very"...

Mar 29, 2015,00:21 AM
 

Thanks for sharing your info with me, Art.


In the few weeks since I first saw the watch and started my research I've probably come across 50+ early-1950s Connie serial numbers, whether via enthusiasts such as yourself sharing with me or images of watches I found online. So far this watch is still wearing the crown of lowest Connie serial number I have seen. 

Interestingly, it also has the lowest case number I've come across. In other words, it's definitely a very early Connie. 

Unfortunately I have learnt that it's impossible to tell exactly how early, and this because of the manner in which watches were produced at Omega at the time. Specifically, the first Connies used the 352 movement that was already in use on the Seamaster, and a case that was identical in shape to that used on the Centenary. During manufacturing parts were not drawn consecutively from existing inventory so one can see caliber 352s with serial numbers within circa a range of ten in a Connie and a Seamaster, with the Seamaster having been assembled much earlier. 

The closest I have got -- so far -- to identifying exactly when this watch was made is that it is from the first production batch of 2,500 Connies, created from January to December 1952. During this period the first Connies were shipped around the time of the 1952 Swiss Watch Show, which probably took place in early March. My hope is that this watch turns out to be one of these... But to know this for sure I guess I'll have to splurge for an extract from the archives.

Another interesting point about this watch is the dial. My research has not come across another Connie with this exact same dial, ie with this combination of the thin faceted dart-shaped hour markers with the applied numbers at 3, 6, 9 and 12. So the dial too can be described as rare.

I'm waiting to receive more feedback from Connie collectors and experts, both on this forum and on other Omega forums on which I posted the same question. Once I feel that I've exhausted this source of information I'll go ahead and order an extract from the archives, which will give me the date of full assemblage of the case and the movement and when and where it was sent to.

The search continues...

ghoti

PS  Credit -- and thanks -- is due to Desmond from Omega Constellation Collectors Blogspot, probably the #1 Connie expert and aficionado. Desmond has been extremely kind in sharing with me his unmatched knowledge of Connies. Most of the information I wrote above was sourced from Desmond, and in some cases I have allowed myself to quote directly from emails he has sent me. (Thanks again, Desmond!)
 


More posts: ConstellationSeamaster

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

How early is this early Omega Constellation?

 
 By: ghoti : March 28th, 2015-09:04
Hi there, I recently saw an Omega Constellation reference 2648 calibre 352 in a solid 18k gold case with a very low movement serial number (12280xxx) and case number (11000xxx). Both these numbers are the lowest I have seen on a Connie, and I say this aft...  

The one cal 352 in my files . . .

 
 By: Dr No : March 28th, 2015-13:53
. . . which, incidentally, doesn't belong to me, has a movement number of 12,334, xxx. You're on the trail of an early production piece; here's hoping it ends up in your collection! Cordially, Art

There's no doubt it's very early, the question is how "very"...

 
 By: ghoti : March 29th, 2015-00:21
Thanks for sharing your info with me, Art. In the few weeks since I first saw the watch and started my research I've probably come across 50+ early-1950s Connie serial numbers, whether via enthusiasts such as yourself sharing with me or images of watches ... 

The 1/5 second hash marks . . .

 
 By: Dr No : March 29th, 2015-11:16
. . . and serrated crown are also atypical attributes of this example. Please, cut to the chase and order the extract - utterly fascinating, this. (Assuming it's yours, of course!) Art

'Scientific' chapter ring and serrated crown on early Connies

 
 By: ghoti : March 29th, 2015-12:23
Once again I must defer to Desmond's extensive knowledge when responding. According to what Desmond wrote to me, the 'scientific' chapter ring was in fact a feature in some early Connies from the 1952 production slate. In fact the first Connie dial -- acc... 

Since the Centenary models were fitted . . .

 
 By: Dr No : March 29th, 2015-12:41
. . . with serrated crowns, there's at least an even chance the original owner is correct. Art

You're probably right but...

 
 By: ghoti : March 29th, 2015-14:34
...I'm illiterate when it comes to Connie crowns so I bow before your experience. All I know about Connie crowns I learnt from Desmond, either directly or from the illuminating article he wrote on the subject. Definitely recommended, it can be found on hi... 

Similar watch: 2 different crowns...

 
 By: MikiJ : April 2nd, 2015-05:55
The "Old Man" got this Connie with the same or at least similar crown. After some deliberation here a very generous member sent what Mickey believes to be the correct crown. The plot thickens ;-) ...  

Tell Mickey that Desmond probably agrees with him

 
 By: ghoti : April 2nd, 2015-06:58
Lovely, MikiJ. Thanks! Your watch is indeed very similar to mine. May I ask what are the first five digits of your watch's movement serial number and case serial number? Thanks again, ghoti

Thanks! [nt]

 
 By: ghoti : April 2nd, 2015-07:39

Called my watch maker...

 
 By: MikiJ : April 2nd, 2015-07:42
He said he remembered it being cica 1954.